(For now just a small overview of the plan of the future article)

Knowledge of Everything Applied:
Chemistry, Evolution, Biology, ...

This is just a preliminary plan of what this page will contain in a year/years or so (when I find time/wish to learn English and write this article.)

I stated some time ago that I have KOE, and we had a few discussions, and reasonably they were ending with one request -- to show proof of me having Knowledge of Everything, something that can be checked or measured.
By that time I postponed it all to dedicate time to it later to deliver the information without opening actually my trade secret and to show how beautifully it can be applied to different areas.
I still don't have time and wish to write it but I spent a few days and considered the basis of the material and wrote some notes and brief plan of the future content of this page.

Fist I will show how actually chemical bonds and chemical reactions work.
Then small overview of the evolution of live organisms.
Process of development of the body of a human (and of other animals and organisms) from one cell up to complete body.
The key of this article will be the erasure of genetics (to the ground) nearly the same way I did it with physics, with the difference that I will provide all the correct substantiations and explanations. New, correct genetics.
Also I will write pretty big paragraph on physics where I will show some mistakes in the development of physics, some correct methods and some other things.

It should cover a lot of auxiliary questions like: why the development of embryo is a little "strange" at first stages, why body gets old and dies, what is life, what is the goal of evolution,
and it should touch partially or completely some other questions and areas.

The matter is that it's impossible to describe all these things correctly without understanding the basics of chemistry, as almost everything in live organisms is governed by processes based on properties of chemical bonds and chemical reactions.
As you understand current chemistry has not much in common with reality (especially it will be obvious after the note about physics below.)


Also as you see I have corrected huge flaw in the name of the information we are discussing.
Another luck, the names ware free and I've bought them for a dozen of years ))
They were waiting for me )

I expect this article, or more correctly a small book with small theorems, pictures, charts and curves to appear in the future (if my plans will not change), but...
I can release a bit of information which shows how far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far, far.... from truth is current science.

I wouldn't say physics missed much.
Actually physics missed almost the whole world.

Lets consider for example gravitational theories:

  Heat affects nuclear bonds/forces.
  Heat affects chemical forces.
  Heat affects forces in crystal structures.
  Heat affects forces in liquids.
  And... heat does not affect gravitation.

Another variant:

      Heat affects nuclear forces of attraction.
      Heat affects chemical forces of attraction.
      Heat affects forces of attraction in crystal structures.
      Heat affects forces of attraction in liquids.
      And... heat does not affect force of attraction.

Why?
I have to disappoint you here.
It does. And very significantly.
(Your current limitation of perception does not change reality.)

And where is heat in the formulas of forces of gravitation?
How is observed reality taken into consideration in the theories of gravitation?
It is ignored. Nearly completely.

I have taken heat here just as an example.
There are a lot of other basic things like: different kinds and states of matter, complexity and already long ago ultimately proven final unidirectionality of matter→energy transformations (what is actually the reason of expansion of the universe as I've shown in previous article and you already had it on the example of perpetual motion machines, though not so deeply substantiated), mutual influence of substances, ...


Pretty obvious thing:
      Ignorance of (observable variety of) reality at the input of the theory gives ignorance of (variety of) reality at the output of the theory.
      Nearly complete ignorance of (observable variety of) reality at the input of the theory gives nearly complete ignorance of (variety of) reality at the output of the theory.

Tiny changes in complex things/formulas can give unbelievably different results.
Nearly complete ignorance of observable variety of phenomenons (with the goal to describe these phenomenons) is complete nonsense to the n-th power (where n is at least >14) from the very beginning.


And it's absolutely logically that theories (very) faintly concern reality.
Obviously science has not even gotten yet on the road that leads to the truth, neither in mathematics, nor in physics or philosophy.

I think I will cover more of such examples with brief explanations of mistakes in this article when/if ever it's complete.

And... let's take something that can be checked.

Neutron.

Neutron does not exist.

Yeah, yeah, yeah, my friend,
neutron does not exist.

There are just uniform nuclei in each atom.

Yes, in "neutron"/energy generators energy is released from the mass and it affects the other mass at some distance but there is no such particle as neutron and the real processes are different.

You can easily build large number of experiments to check this as there are just a few main requirements (from the point of detection of change of mass caused by "neutron") such as: there should be ability to measure separately the resulting masses which lose/get "neutrons" and atoms of these masses should not fly away.

In correctly set up experiment you will not detect any change of mass in "neutron" generators except possible binding energy based mass defects, but this can be considered as negligible for such experiments.
Actually there happens tiny change of mass that concerns exactly this process, but it requires much higher precision to detect it.


As you already guessed electrons do not exist.
If you examine plates of charged capacitor you will find that they have the same properties. There is superfluous charge/energy, but it's of the same type at each plate.
Electricity is a flow of superfluous energy (in the form that cannot be transformed back to matter). We've talked about unidirectionality of matter→energy transformations, and there may be a chain of complex transformations on this way. There can be a little different forms of energy stored in atom which under certain conditions may transform between each other or to more basic forms of energy, and cause different kinds of interactions. Example: impurity conduction of semiconductors. According to ancient (for you still modern) physics one atom of impurity (to thousands atoms of main material) gives one electron (presumably once) and conductivity of the whole material raises in thousand times. It's unbelievable. And it's unbelievably far from truth. In reality atoms of impurity due to specific configuration have a little bit different preferences for each internal process of transformation of matter to energy or stored energy to different or less stable forms of energy (compared to the ones that stand behind chemical or crystalline bonds) like electricity or heat and these specifics result in different intensity of each process of transformation. At the same time atom can compensate lack of energy of certain type (compared to the other atoms) taking it from the other atoms of the material. So far we have (1) one atom which has a little bit different configuration of internal structure and of processes of transformations between forms of energy and a little bit different ability/capacity to store specific amount of each type of energy and (2) process of exchange of energy of each type between atoms to keep equilibration throughout all the material. In such conditions this atom of impurity works like a tap that pumps energy from one state (superfluous for this atom) to different state (to make equilibrium inside of this atom according to its preferences/specifics) what causes change of equilibrium throughout the whole material and flow of superfluous energy/electricity from this atom to the areas less rich by this kind of energy (and the initial disbalance is created by provision of superfluous energy / electricity to the material) ..... but all these things are clear and obvious after you already have KOE. Yeah, you have something that shows relation between matter and energy, but it's just a fist step and this subject is practically not covered in science in all the completion of observable characteristics and phenomenons of such processes.
Impurity conduction and "tunnel diode". If you take a look at the curves of p-n junction of semiconductor and "tunnel" diode you will see that these are actually the same curves with the difference that "tunnel" diode is a little more stretched with a little bit different middle section. According to ancient physics these processes are governed by different theories, but you see that it is pretty similar case to the one we've just considered. In this case atoms of impurity (because of their different internal configuration) dilute the ability of the material to form p-n junction by taking away the energy (that was intended to be used in the process which forms p-n junction) by pumping it to different form (and spreading across the material in this form) and now to make the process which forms p-n junction to work we have to deliver a lot more energy (in the form of electricity) to compensate the loss on the atoms of impurity. Actually the process that forms p-n junction in this case gets nearly the same amount of energy as in the case without impurity but now we have to deliver a lot more energy to "feed" and overcome the interfering processes of atoms of impurity to have the rest of the energy to be delivered to the process that forms p-n junction. Now atoms of impurity work in a little different direction compared to the previous example. (It's a pity we can't touch superconductors and the basics of matter-energy transformations here as to accelerate industry and give it the maximum possible advance and to get practically nothing in return is not that fun as you can imagine.)
And so forth...
      And so forth......
            And so forth.........

It was a revolution a few years ago.
Now I'm so used to it that it's boring even to count all the differences.
Or it's because it's night and I want to sleep )